Staff Editorials

Game of the Month - February
Posted: 13.03.2012 11:57 by Joe Robinson Comments: 18
It's that time once again folks - time for Game of the Month. This is where we round up the highlight’s of the previous month's releases and put to you our humble view of who we think bested them all. Maybe it will inspire you to pick up a game you never realised was out, maybe it will simply validate your own opinions on these games - either way, we do this for you guys. Let’s have a look at the highlights of February:

Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning

EA’s brand new ip hit the ground running, earning the No.1 slot in the charts for a week, and getting generally favourable reviews. With the creative prowess of Todd McFarlane, Ken Rolston and R.A. Salvatore behind the wheel, it’d be hard to go wrong, and Reckoning gave a very good account for itself. It’s a big, epic, yet slightly traditional fantasy RPG with a core narrative and a combat system that’s similar to something out of Fable.


As Chris Capel says, "Anyone who ventures in to the Kingdoms of Amalur will find a gigantic and compelling RPG experience. It’s not quite ready to topple the big guns of the genre, but despite feeling “inspired” by every RPG or fantasy ever made it manages to offer a unique and entertaining alternative. Even if it does add yet another surly scantily-clad elf girl to the genre."

Final Fantasy XIII-2

Only the second Final Fantasy title that was a direct sequel, Final Fantasy XIII-2 was met with a mixture of suspicion and cautious optimism, depending on what you thought about FFXIII and the previous direct sequel, X-2. Critically, it received everything from a 5/10 from one UK magazine, to our own score of 7.5, to a perfect 40/40 from Famitsu – so if one thing is clear, it’s that gamers will have to make up their own minds (even though you all do anyway).


As far as Nick Akerman is concerned, whilst not perfect, he thought FFXIII-2 was “an appealing return for the much-adhered franchise. It offers some truly unique and intriguing gameplay elements that will invite newcomers whilst challenging series aficionados. This is extremely important after the failings of XIII, as it shows Square Enix are prepared to keep building on the RPG formula they shaped. Serah's adventure is an entertaining and dynamic one, signalling that Final Fantasy is moving in the right direction once again.”

Dear Esther

The second favourite game of February, going by the score it got, Dead Esther won over Manny with its surprising quality, the narrative, and how it questions the traditional idea of what a videogame ‘is’. I’ll let him do the rest of the talking, but this is definitely one you should check out:


“Frankly, for my money, I couldn’t care less. There was more emotional resonance captured in that lonely wander through hills and caves than the majority of releases I’ve played in this or any other year, and it was pitched to a nigh-on perfect length to never outstay its welcome. Do we need shooting, puzzles or interaction to classify something as a videogame? Maybe, but whatever Dear Esther is, don’t get bogged down by the semantics. You’ll be missing out on one of the most haunting and well-executed titles of this or any other generation if you do.”

Wargame: European Escalation

One of my personal favourites of this month, Wargame was an oddly refreshing strategy title from the guys who brought you R.U.S.E. Multiplayer-focused, deck-based, and set during the cold war, Wargame kept everything R.U.S.E. did right, left what it did wrong, and even added in some other unique elements to help make it a very well made strategy game. Single-player is a bit on the weak side, but this game was never about the offline mode. Others have lamented a lack of a proper tutorial as well, but we still feel this is a definite highlight for February, and for Strategy games in the past few months.


As we said in our review: “Some people liked R.U.S.E., some people didn’t. I don’t mind admitting I was probably a little harsh on it when its turn came. Wargame: European Escalation however is definitely a better game – Eugen has taken everything they’ve learned and made a better, more engaging product that’s more focused on the strategy. Looking forward we wouldn’t mind seeing some kind of abilities worked back into the game, whether off-map or unit based (Engineers, for example, don’t really do anything engineering). Regardless of the future though, this game is worth getting now, pure and simple.”

Syndicate

February also saw the release of the long- awaited Syndicate reboot, although we suspect it’s not the re-imagining many of the older fans were hoping for. Still, Starbreeze gave it their all and while Syndicate didn’t totally flop, we here at Strategy Informer at least don’t consider it to be anything special. As Chris puts it:


"I loved both of Starbreeze’s last games, but while I expected to love Syndicate it just left me cold. There’s fun to be had, especially in the co-op which plenty of people will get their teeth into and love, so that makes the game worth it at least. Nevertheless, while Syndicate’s a good solid FPS, it wastes its world, its unique ideas and its potential. And that’s just a damn shame. Bloody corporations."

Catherine

Whilst this game has technically been out for a while now, it only got a UK release in February, and that’s when our review went out. More Anime, than actual game, Catherine was an excellent poster-child for the more narrative driven game, and certainly did a lot for the whole ‘maturity’ issue. Still, it wasn’t perfect, and the ‘game’ elements weren’t that great, and even the story was fairly niche in content.


As our writer Manny put it: “Catherine isn’t a perfect game that’s recommendable to everybody though. Dialogue can be hit-and-miss, and - as with most translated Japanese titles - it’s delivered at a pace that skirts dangerously close to plodding… (but) It gives you most of the control as to the statements it makes about the sanctity and relevance of marriage and commitment, and it’s worth pursuing for those reasons alone.”

Special Mention: Asura’s Wrath, for being so lovingly bonkers. You can read our review here.

And the winner is…

Crusader Kings II

We think February was a month for the indie and niche titles, and this reflects our choice for this month’s Game of the Month. Crusader King’s II is not only a really fun and engaging game in its own right, but it’s probably one of the best Paradox games to date. You get to forge your own destiny for you and your family as you weather through hundreds of years of medieval history, from 1066 all the way to the 1400's.



Through conquest, diplomacy, intrigue (or pure luck), you must forge a dynasty that will stand the test of time. In my own words:

"Whilst the subject matter and the set-up may not be to everyone’s liking, Crusader Kings II is definitely the most impressive Paradox game to date. The game mechanics are an interesting twist on a well-known genre, the code itself is highly polished, and it’s just a really fun and interesting game to play. Some minor improvements could still be made, and this really is a game of patience, even more so than other Paradox games. Like we said at the beginning though, playing is winning, and there’s something quite satisfying about leading your house to power and glory through whatever means you can, for as long as you can."

February was an interesting month for games, filled with sequels and new ip’s alike, AAA’s and Indies, and plenty of them. It’s a good sign for the year ahead, and we hope we’ve illuminated you guys as to what’s available. Don’t forget to check out our review section to see the rest of February’s releases that we’ve covered. You never know what you might discover!

Comments

By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Mar 13, 2012
SirRoderick
Might want to stop using the winner's screenshot for the frontpage.

But yeah, I agree with this :)
By Kres (SI Elite) on Mar 13, 2012
Kres
Why Roderick?
By nocutius (SI Elite) on Mar 13, 2012
nocutius
Cause it gives things away :)
By Sarayakat (SI Newbie) on Mar 13, 2012
Sarayakat
Those are some really bright colors on that CK map. Which build is that?
By novapaddy (SI Member) on Mar 13, 2012
novapaddy
Your article has encouraged me to take a look at Dear Esther... seems wonderful.. It's a game that I totally missed.. probably the name?... I'm buying it today on Steam. THANKS
By Kres (SI Elite) on Mar 13, 2012
Kres
@nocutius: I don't get it. lol I'm kidding, ok yeah we need a graphic... we'll get something sorted for that.

@novapaddy: Yeah would be kind of weird if somebody asks you what you're playing. [I'm playing Battlefield 3 and Dear Esther. Ah yes... wait what?? Dear Esther??] A bit weird cute name. I didn't played it but it seems that people love the game.
By novapaddy (SI Member) on Mar 14, 2012
novapaddy
Dear Esther... 8 euros of WOE!

I'm running Win7 32 Premium, and I haven't had game install problems since XP, and that must be 2 or 3 years ago...

Dear Esther installs, verify files fails. I delete and install again. Verify files passes. I go to run the game: I get "failed to make a D3D device". So I upgrade my video drivers, do Windows Update, go into msconfig and stop all services as demanded in the Steam Support section... and try again... same.

I give up. I'm NOT spending a whole day trying to get a game to work... like I'm sure, we all used to years ago..

So, Dear Esther will remain unplayed. Pity.
By Kres (SI Elite) on Mar 14, 2012
Kres
D3D, is that directX? I don't know really, just tossing a thought. Bummer man... Awfully dear Esther...
By novapaddy (SI Member) on Mar 14, 2012
novapaddy
Yeah, I even tried extra settings that Steam suggested for my ATI card. .. this error only happens with ATI cards!!. But I just don't have the energy right now to go through the forums etc etc. It's just that with Windows 7, I've not had any problems with any games. This is the first.

Seems Esther will remain a lonely wallflower...
By novapaddy (SI Member) on Mar 15, 2012
novapaddy
Thanks to UTube, I was able to get Dearest Esther to play. You go into Steam, pick the game, go properties, and set Launch Options to your display parameters. Mine was: -w 1366 -h 768. And it played no problems.
By djole381 (SI Elite) on Mar 15, 2012
djole381
@novapaddy
Better switch to Nvidia card m8, it'll save you from a lot of frustration. I know, I used to have an ATI card myself...
By nocutius (SI Elite) on Mar 15, 2012
nocutius
Can't let that one pass djole :)

There's nothing wrong with ATi, most of my cards in the last 10 years were ATi, all problem free. The only card I had issues with was an Nvidia one but that doesn't mean i will advise agains Nvidia in general cause I know it all comes down to chance.
By novapaddy (SI Member) on Mar 15, 2012
novapaddy
Well... I've "played" Dearest Esther... What can I say? It took about 2 hours from start to finish. I wandered about a lonely island, which was in many ways beautiful to look at, but.... .... .... there was no interaction, no action, no anything, just wandering..

My advice to you is to buy something else mate!

EDIT: and as for an ATI card. I've had this rig for about 3 years? I've never had a problem playing anything before. I used to care a lot about pc hardware n stuff, but I got over it... I used to build my own rig etc etc... but nowadays, I buy "off the shelf" and spare myself SO much stress and worry ... LOL
By djole381 (SI Elite) on Mar 15, 2012
djole381
@noctius
ATI cards themselves are great but have shoddy drivers. Numerous times I couldn't play certain games because of them. Then I got my GTX 560 and haven't had a problem since.
By nocutius (SI Elite) on Mar 15, 2012
nocutius
I know what you meant, when people complain about ATi they usually mean the drivers. But like I said, it all comes down to chance, to some weird combination of hardware and drivers and it effect a very small portion of people, it obviously sucks when you fall into that group yourself so I get you.

But things are not even close to being bad enough to be advising against ATi in general, that's the only point i'm trying to dispute.
By Kres (SI Elite) on Mar 15, 2012
Kres
So it's a total trash Novapaddy? How can it be trash and amongst the games we mentioned for the game of the month (not a question).
http://xbradtc.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/facepalm.jpg
Anybody else tried it?
By novapaddy (SI Member) on Mar 15, 2012
novapaddy
Well I'll explain myself a bit better:
Graphics were good and very pretty in parts. I took some screens for my desktop.
I wouldn't even call it a game. There is NO interaction. Nothing happens. You can do nothing except wander around the cliff paths, the beach a little, caves and between caves. You cannot pick up anything, or look at anything like a book or whatever. ALL you do, is wander about. I won't spoil the ending, just in case there is an absolute idiot (besides me!) who will buy this "game".

No... this "game" was a demo of some graphics for possibly someone's CV for a real game company. This "game" was a total waste of money.

I won't complain as to how this became among one of your "games of the month" BUT I will be much more selective and not take your word for it ever again...

EDIT: Do you think I'm being unfair? OK, then you go and spend your money and let us know all about what you think about it afterwards. Let's see you put your money where your mouth is...

I think you'll be back and you'll agree with me...
By freezeice10 (I just got here) on Mar 30, 2013
freezeice10
I had the same feelings as novapaddy the first time I played Dear Esther, but after looking back now the game is much more deep than you think. Here's a review: http://gamingpoint.org/game-review/dear-esther-review

But for those who have played the game read on because there will be spoilers ahead. Along with the symbolism, there are 'ghosts' in the game, have you noticed them? There's also some secret writings on the walls, and also when you look at the candles in the river near the end, you will see a shadow of a person. There's a lot more to the game than meets the eye, but I can totally see why people hate the game. The game isn't for everybody.