Blogging

On This Day in History: January 24th, 1965 - Winston S. Churchill Dies!
Posted: 01/24/2012 10:49 by herodotusComments: 16
Sir Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, the British leader who guided Great Britain and the Allies through the crisis of World War II, dies in London at the age of 90.

Born at Blenheim Palace in 1874, Churchill joined the British Fourth Hussars upon his father's death in 1895. During the next five years, he enjoyed an illustrious military career, serving in India, the Sudan, and South Africa, and distinguishing himself several times in battle. In 1899, he resigned his commission to concentrate on his literary and political career and in 1900 was elected to Parliament as a Conservative MP from Oldham. In 1904, he joined the Liberals, serving in a number of important posts before being appointed Britain's first lord of the admiralty in 1911, where he worked to bring the British navy to a readiness for the war that he foresaw.

In 1915, in the second year of World War I, Churchill was held responsible for the disastrous Dardanelles and Gallipoli campaigns, and he was excluded from the war coalition government. He resigned and volunteered to command an infantry battalion in France. However, in 1917, he returned to politics as a cabinet member in the Liberal government of Lloyd George. From 1919 to 1921, he was secretary of state for war and in 1924 returned to the Conservative Party, where two years later he played a leading role in the defeat of the General Strike of 1926. Out of office from 1929 to 1939, Churchill issued unheeded warnings of the threat of Nazi and Japanese aggression.

After the outbreak of World War II in Europe, Churchill was called back to his post as first lord of the admiralty and eight months later replaced the ineffectual Neville Chamberlain as prime minister of a new coalition government. In the first year of his administration, Britain stood alone against Nazi Germany, but Churchill promised his country and the world that the British people would "never surrender." He rallied the British people to a resolute resistance and expertly orchestrated Franklin D. Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin into an alliance that crushed the Axis.

In July 1945, 10 weeks after Germany's defeat, his Conservative government suffered a defeat against Clement Attlee's Labour Party, and Churchill resigned as prime minister. He became leader of the opposition and in 1951 was again elected prime minister. Two years later, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature for his six-volume historical study of World War II and for his political speeches; he was also knighted by Queen Elizabeth II. In 1955, he retired as prime minister but remained in Parliament until 1964, the year before his death.

Permalink | Read herodotus's blog

User Comments on herodotus's blog

By hunter612 (SI Core) on 01/24/2012 15:39
hunter612
Good read. I never knew much about Churchill!
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on 01/24/2012 15:41
SirRoderick
A very interesting and remarkably influential man. Don't get many of these.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 01/24/2012 22:50
herodotus
Not a very popular chap when the disastrous Dardanelles Campaign finished (as he was First Sea Lord and it was his plan) he was of course self-obsessed, self-important and felt fated to lead the Nation he loved. For all of his faults he was a a brilliant man, with many flaws to be certain, however his sole interest in The Pacific Theatre being the preservation of the British Empire made him unpopular in Australia. His demand of Prime Minister John Curtin to send troops from North Africa to Singapore was curtly denied by an equally formidable PM - ours. The troops were needed in New Guinea and that's where they were sent (and to Malaya). This brought about a final seperation by Australia from Britain as it's sole "parent" and a gravitation to the USA as a more important "partner".
There are many, many criticisms of Churchill's career that may easily be categorised in an almost endless list, but his redeeming qualities as a politician and leader of a desperate nation at war, alone outweigh these.
I've read all 6 volumes of his saga "The Second World War" and a good deal of "A History of the English-Speaking Peoples". Heavy going at times, they are still regarded as the epitome of excellence in writing. I'd recommend them to anyone with a smattering of interest in History combined with good writing.
By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 01/25/2012 03:51
SiyaenSokol
Now those books sound very interesting. I am fascinated by the Second War, and the roles that each politician, soldier, and country played.
By hunter612 (SI Core) on 01/25/2012 10:45
hunter612
Going to try and find these books at the library. Or get them online. Hopefully it will be an interesting read!
By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 01/26/2012 00:19
SiyaenSokol
I am sure that it will be an interesting read. I still would like to read Mein Kampf, but I heard that it is a difficult book to read... I will find this out for myself.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on 01/26/2012 00:26
SirRoderick
Considering the fact that Adolf was pretty much batshit insane, I can only imagine how he'd write.

P.S.
Don't mention to peoplr you're reading that too much :P
By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 01/26/2012 00:48
SiyaenSokol
Is it really that bad? Didn't think that it would be too much of a problem since it is quite easy to obtain.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on 01/26/2012 01:11
SirRoderick
It's not something you mention in casual conversation. "Yeah I'm readin Mein Kampf at the moment..."

It will still get you awkward looks.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 01/26/2012 01:41
herodotus
Actually, Roderick I think it shows a keen interest in History and I'd bet instead of an awkward silence you'd be asked questions of it instead. Maybe that was just my experience when reading it, or fighting my way through it as it was a tremendously difficult read. Only one other book I've found just as badly written and horrendously boring - "Star Wars" by George Lucas. What a nightmare that was.
I have two copies, one in English and the other an orignal published in 1939 for serving officers, bound in white leather and embossed with gold leaf. Probably be worth something by now....

The book was required reading in 1933, and then became mandatory to own and carry by all personnel in the Wehrmacht and special forces (Luftwaffe, Kriegsmarine, SS etc) from 1938. Most never read it, though as even then most found it exceptionally difficult to get through.

For anyone interested in the true discussion that took place over "The Final Solution" should get a hold of a copy of "Conspiracy". "Conspiracy" is a BBC/HBO television film which dramatizes the 1942 Wannsee Conference. The film delves into the psychology of Nazi officials involved in the "Final Solution of the Jewish Question" during World War II. It is an English-speaking adaptation of the German film "The Wannsee Conference" (1984). I own both.

By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on 01/26/2012 03:22
SirRoderick
I would agree with you, but I'm saying most people would just look at you funny. It's something I'll get around to reading myself, just because it's one of those books so irrevocably tied to history.

On George Lucas....yeah, I can image.
By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 01/27/2012 00:14
SiyaenSokol
I understand your point Roderick. Adolf wasn't actually one of the most favourite people in history. In any event, a book that I am sure it will explain a lot about how the war came to being.

Star Wars overall isn't an easy story if you think about it. A lot of books need to be read in order to understand what is really going on, and why certain things happened.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on 01/27/2012 01:55
SirRoderick
That would be the farking problem with Star Wars. The original trilogy made sense, you watch the movies and you know what happens and why.

For Lucas' trilogy, you actually need a bunch of third party authors to make up convoluted reasons for why the movies made sense even slightly and it still doesn't take away the unbelievably incomprehensible "plot".

I think it's fair to say that those books are all after-the-fact attempts to make the whole thing somewhat less retarded. No movie should have to rely on that sort of stuff to make sense in the first place.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 01/27/2012 02:30
herodotus
The original Trilogy had very little to do with Lucas. Yes, he wrote the first one (and the horrendous novelization of it that I am referring to) but rapidly lost interest. He loathed Directing (why he didn't direct again until "Episode One"), and became more a "Head of Production" for the phenomenon "Star Wars" became. John Dykstra, the brilliant mind behind the SFX in all three original films worked virtually unsupervised and kind of made it up as he went along. Lucas had moved on and was more interested in getting together with his buddy Spielberg to make other projects.
One thing he did make sure of, once it became the hit it was. Everything went through him, and was approved (or not) by him. A tyrant, to be sure, I still find it fascinating that "Star Wars" was the hit it was (I didn't then of course). The cinema had been flooded with Dramas for years ("Love Story", "Kramer Vs. Kramer" and all that trash) the audience just wanted a return to the days of Serial Westerns, Heroes & Villains and War movies (they just didn't know it). "Star Wars" delivered on every level.
The entire dogfighting sequence over the Death Star at the end was choreographed by overlaying Dykstra's models onto WWII gun camera footage of the real thing. The team behind "SW" was brilliant - Lucas, not so much.
Just try and read "Star Wars", the novel of the film. I dare you. The entire first paragraph (and it's quite large) does not have even one period.
I still have it in my bookshelves, somewhere...hmmmm.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on 01/27/2012 07:28
SirRoderick
"The original Trilogy had very little to do with Lucas."

That's why I refer to the second trilogy as "Lucas' trilogy" :)

Dykstra deserved all the credit.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 01/27/2012 10:48
herodotus
Gotcha - I was confused, a state I am only too familiar with:)
I did think they rescued the second trilogy some with "Episode III", not by much but they tried. I've watched several doco's of Dykstra working on the films, and the Battle of Hoth looks crazy fun when you see it being done with the models and the baby powder they used for snow.
Even at the time I first saw the film in January 1978 I remember thinking the Battle Over Death Star was the weakest section of the film as the models "looked" like models for the first time. The egg carton surface of the "star" didn't help but it looked pretty bad even then. John Williams' score actually saved the whole movie from being a bit of a giggle and imbued it, at least for me with grandeur. I must have listened to that double album for hours on end. The second was a disappointment.