Blogging

On This Day in History: June 25th, 1876 - The Battle of Little Bighorn!
Posted: 06/25/2012 06:28 by herodotusComments: 7
On this day in 1876, Native American forces led by Chiefs Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull defeat the U.S. Army troops of Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer in a bloody battle near southern Montana's Little Bighorn River.

Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull, leaders of the Sioux tribe on the Great Plains, strongly resisted the mid-19th-century efforts of the U.S. government to confine their people to reservations. In 1875, after gold was discovered in South Dakota's Black Hills, the U.S. Army ignored previous treaty agreements and invaded the region. This betrayal led many Sioux and Cheyenne tribesmen to leave their reservations and join Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse in Montana. By the late spring of 1876, more than 10,000 Native Americans had gathered in a camp along the Little Bighorn River--which they called the Greasy Grass--in defiance of a U.S. War Department order to return to their reservations or risk being attacked.

In mid-June, three columns of U.S. soldiers lined up against the camp and prepared to march. A force of 1,200 Native Americans turned back the first column on June 17. Five days later, General Alfred Terry ordered Custer's 7th Cavalry to scout ahead for enemy troops. On the morning of June 25, Custer drew near the camp and decided to press on ahead rather than wait for reinforcements.

At mid-day, Custer's 600 men entered the Little Bighorn Valley. Among the Native Americans, word quickly spread of the impending attack. The older Sitting Bull rallied the warriors and saw to the safety of the women and children, while Crazy Horse set off with a large force to meet the attackers head on. Despite Custer's desperate attempts to regroup his men, they were quickly overwhelmed. Custer and some 200 men in his battalion were attacked by as many as 3,000 Native Americans; within an hour, Custer and every last one of his soldier were dead.

The Battle of Little Bighorn--also called Custer's Last Stand--marked the most decisive Native American victory and the worst U.S. Army defeat in the long Plains Indian War. The gruesome fate of Custer and his men outraged many white Americans and confirmed their image of the Indians as wild and bloodthirsty. Meanwhile, the U.S. government increased its efforts to subdue the tribes. Within five years, almost all of the Sioux and Cheyenne would be confined to reservations.

Permalink | Read herodotus's blog

User Comments on herodotus's blog

By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 06/27/2012 02:14
SiyaenSokol
This is actually a terrible part of history. I have a lot of respect for the Native Americas, though I understand that they are not nearly as what they used to be.

What happened to those people is actually heartbreaking, but then again, it happened in most parts of the world. Where, the Europeans found land, new blood was bound to be spilled... so much for civilization I guess.

But... this is the way of mankind.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 06/27/2012 11:17
herodotus
This is one of the few times the American Aboriginal had a chance to fight back, mostly through the mistakes and ego-driven blunderings of Colonel Custer. It was a tragedy for both sides, as the retaliation by the US Gov't was terrible.
Here in Australia, the English had procvlaimed the land "Terra Nulleus" meaning there was no one living here, and when the Australian Aboriginal was encountered there began a systematic alughter of them.
There was the usual infected blankets given to them, as was done in the US but after that the English sttlers, or what I should time Asutralian Settlers just shot them - in large numbers. There are no Australian Aboriganls in the island state of Tasmania (that little bit of land at the bottom of our map) as all were killed - genocide, you might say. We have one of the worst histories where the First Australians, as the Aborigines are now known are concerned. Their mistreatment contimues to this day with their average mortality age ten years lower than any other ethnic group here inclding Anglo-Saxon Australians (or "Skips" as we are known in slang terms).
By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 06/28/2012 05:57
SiyaenSokol
Damn... I didn't realize that the Aborigines are still being mistreated in Australia... or at least what is left of them.

What happened to those people is horrific as well. It is heartbreaking, how people could invade a country, and just murder its native inhabitants like that. I am mainly pointing my finger at the British and the Spaniards.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 06/28/2012 07:12
herodotus
It's an ongoing problem here, and Australia has one of the worst track records when it comes to the treatment of it's indigenous population according to the UN Human Rights Committee. It's a very volatile and heated topic here when it comes up, with racism still an ugly face of our society.
As for killing them off, sickening as this is, the British considered this "Terra Nulleus" so they had no right to be here. New Zealand is a good example of how things should have gone, with the Maoris being shown respect and understanding. NZ has two National Anthems to this day, one in English one in Maori.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 06/28/2012 07:14
herodotus
Our history, or that of the British Empire is another reason I look forward to the day wheh we drop the Monarchy as our Head of State and become a Republic.
By SiyaenSokol (SI Elite) on 06/29/2012 04:09
SiyaenSokol
It is actually quite interesting that the Monarchy still exists today. As far as I understand this, they actually have no more power over England.

It amazes me that we choose (or in some cases get forced) to have a leader, who we believe will help us in struggling times, and direct us into the right directions... only to have a greedy, and power hungry person.

In places like Zimbabwe... and actually most of the African countries you have these dictators... and they don't take no for an answer when it comes to ruling their country.

Take Idi Amin for an example... he wasn't very successful, but none the less one of the most brutal.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on 06/29/2012 09:59
herodotus
They are a great money earner for Great Britain and is why the US wishes (albeit behind close doors) they had one. Any country still with a Monarchy, even if it is a "reigning moanarchy" is still democratic, though with a great tourist attraction.

The dictators of Africa and ineed the Middle East (befpre most were toppled recently) have absolute power, love it and don't lewt go. Then again, as has been seen in Iraq Egypt and Libya the country is often in worse shape when the dicator is overthrown and replaced with 'democracy'.