Review

A Game Of Thrones - RPG Review (PC)

Wow, those last few episodes of Game of Thrones were fantastic right? Really gets you buzzed to go out there and play an excellent fantasy RPG featuring intrigue, betrayal, sex, murky morals, understandable villains, flawed heroes, and maybe a dragon. Well good news, The Witcher 2 is available now on PC and 360! Oh, wait, there’s an actual Game of Thrones game out as well? Does it meet those standards too? Well, apart from the dragon, and the “excellent” part...

I’m not going to beat around the hedge knight here, Game of Thrones is a fantastic series of books, an incredible TV series, but a less-than-stellar game. You really should not be considering buying it unless you’ve played a number of other similar, infinitely better RPGs first – most notably Dragon Age: Origins and The Witcher 2. Nevertheless, that does not mean you should discount Game of Thrones: The Game completely.

Mors Westford sat on the Wall. Mors Westford had a great fall. I won’t spoil any more of the plot

At the top of reasons why: the world. George RR Martin’s Westeros is unlike any other fantasy world, mostly because it keeps the actual fantasy to a minimum. Dragons and the zombie-raising White Walkers are considered myths, magic is often illusion and barely features, elves, dwarves and other non-human races don’t appear at all, and it’s all very adult and gritty. Characters can die at any point, usually when you least expect it. As a fantasy RPG videogame this is all very refreshing (especially the lack of dragons which both Witcher 2 and Elder Scrolls have fallen prey to), and developer Cyanide have respected all the rules George RR Martin has laid out. Okay, it bends some rules slightly, but only to make it a better game.

Following strongly after this is the story. Set before and over the events of the first book (or first season) but not directly retelling any of those various plotlines, Cyanide have instead opted to tell a new story from two angles. The two protagonists of this tale are Mors Westford of the Night’s Watch and Alester Sarwyck, the estranged son of a prestigious family and priest of the fire god R’hllor. Both sides appear at first to be completely separate (with one being several months behind the other) but then slowly begin to influence and coalesce together.

While the plot starts off slow, with Mors tasked with finding a girl and Alester trying to reclaim his family name, it soon begins to build into one packed with all the intrigue, violence and surprises that make the show and books so entertaining. Honestly. There are twists, betrayals, and happenings here that I honestly didn’t expect. Just when you think things are going to be wrapped up they go to hell – that’s Game of Thrones in a nutshell, and the best thing about GOTTG is that it continues this admirably.

Even better, GOTTG is one of the few games that properly attempts to incorporate player choices into the narrative, and have the consequences play out later on. Furthermore unlike every game but this and the two Witcher titles your choices don’t fall into simple “paragon and renegade” decisions, and the consequences are never obvious. For example, spare the life of a seemingly innocent girl and she might warn the dozen guards outside the room, but kill her and you lose a life-saving hostage later. While these choices never quite reach the level of Witcher 2 in scope they do add a lot to your involvement with the story. Frankly I applaud any developer that attempts to follow CD Projekt’s polished footsteps, and it’s nice to have another Witcher-like game out there.

Where the storytelling falls apart unfortunately is with the voice-acting. It’s utterly awful, honestly like they just dragged in some English speakers from off the street. The older characters in particular don’t seem to have even read their lines beforehand. You get used to it after a while, but the lack of emotion in certain key scenes really dampens their impact. Concerning the TV series, the actors for Varys (the Spider), Queen Cersei and Jeor Mormont appear, but apart from Conleth Hill’s silky Varys they seem to have recorded their lines over the phone.

The clash of steel, the chink of arrows, the swish of my lovely red cape... war is hell

And the first great part, the world, sadly doesn’t go unscathed either in its translation to game. The Wall, that great ice barrier at the top of Westeros, is suitably impressive, but there’s nothing really to do there. In fact, that’s the main problem with all the locations – there’s not enough life in any of them. People converse but you often can’t join in, and even the sellers say absolutely nothing. You can wander around the entirety of King’s Landing and not be able to do actually anything. There’s hidden coins to find (none of this ‘junk’ nonsense, most things you pick up just turn to coins) and occasionally someone to talk to or get a quest from, but it’s all too rare.

That’s GOTTG’s biggest problem: the almost total absence of side-quests. Which is a shame, because the very few that are here are actually pretty good, like finding a traitor in the Night’s Watch using trickery, bribery, and Mors’ dog to track scents. They’re the best way to imbue life into game locations and persuade players to explore, and there’s simply not enough of them here. Shame.

In actual gameplay terms GOTTG will be divisive. Don’t expect a hack-and-slasher action RPG. The controls and combat both hark back to old-school RPGs, both in good ways and bad. I personally like the combat, which works in a similar fashion to Knights of the Old Republic or Neverwinter Nights 2, where you mix between attacks, items and special powers that cost energy. It’s all real-time, although time slows when you call up the powers menu. You unlock powers and skills for both Mors and Alester as you go, and certain powers require certain traits (like one-handed swords) or enemy states (like Burning, Stunned or Bleeding) to work. It’s all very involving, and compared to the frustrating system used in Risen 2 it at least stays enjoyable all the way through. Well, mostly. You are just fighting the same enemies all the time really, and don’t even think about picking a ranged weapons class.

There also a stealthy sub-game involving Mors’ dog, which you can control to either sniff out scents or rip the throats out of unsuspecting enemies. It’s quite fun, although ridiculously no-one notices a dog pulling lumps of flesh off the neck of their now very dead friend two metres away. Alester merely gets “the light of R’hllor” that allows him to highlight hidden objects. Not as fun but vital.

Control-wise though on the PC I was astonished to discover that you need to hold the right-mouse button to move the camera, something I’d hoped had disappeared forever. You have to left-click items or characters in the world to ‘use’ them, instead of a simple Use Key. You get used to it after a while, but seriously – why is it here? It just frustrates.

Game of Thrones: The Game gets numerous things right but then stumbles on some massive hurdles. The story is great with many unexpected twists, the combat is fairly entertaining, and the attempts at creating a choice/consequence system like The Witcher’s is laudable. Characters are all deep shades of grey and have hidden secrets and depths, and the consequences of your decisions are rarely obvious. Trouble is, the utterly atrocious voice-acting robs the story of a lot of its weight, and the few TV actors don’t help matters with their phoned-in performances.

Yep, this is Game of Thrones all right

The worst thing about GOTTG though is that George RR Martin’s land of Westeros feels utterly flat and lifeless. Drab graphics, barely any side-quests or people to talk to (and why would you want to when the acting is so bad?), with cities merely a maze of boring passages. With the TV series rivalling the Lord of the Rings films in terms of effects it’s sad that the game can’t even show King’s Landing in full or even use the aware-winning title sequence from the show (although the theme tune is present on the menu screen). There’s not enough to explore and not enough of a reason to do any exploring. What’s the point of going to a whorehouse if you can’t even talk to the receptionist?

If you’ve played through The Witcher 2 and are hankering for another similar experience, and don’t mind a budget-feeling title, then Game of Thrones is well worth considering. It may screw up a few major things, but I definitely ended up preferring it to Risen 2: Dark Waters (even though they share the same score). That was made by veterans of the RPG genre – this is from a team whose most notable title is Pro Cycling Manager. I’d call that an achievement.

Top Game Moment: The wedding scene between boo-hiss bastard (literally) Valarr and Alester’s sister. It doesn’t end well, in the most unexpected and shocking ways possible.

<a href="http://www.game-advertising-online.com/">Game Advertising Online</a> ad requires flash player.

Videos

Comments

By danfreeman (SI Core) on Jun 07, 2012
danfreeman
I`m sorry but i have to ask this:why would you praise the lack of dragons?Did they eat your sandwich or something?And how the hell can this be called a fantasy world without any fantasy?
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
I think you misunderstood him, he's not praising the lack of fantasy, he's praising he fact that the author didn't feel the need to slather it on in prepousterous measures like most others do. It can be fanatsy WITHOUT a dozen different races wield magic spells like they were starring in a Dragon Ball Z episode.

At any rate, just watching season 2 now and besides a few confounding points where they deviate from details given in the book for no apparent reason, it's very good indeed. Too bad I see everything coming is all ^_^
By danfreeman (SI Core) on Jun 07, 2012
danfreeman
I`m sorry SirRoderick but to me that`s what fantasy means and i`m not the only guy who thinks that way.This should be called a fictional world not a fantasy one,i mean it`s like saying medieval 2 total war had a fantasy setting.
By unsilviu (SI Core) on Jun 07, 2012
unsilviu
You misunderstand. It's fantasy alright, just not in an in-your-face way. there are dragons, magic and creatures, but they are not the focus. The setting is fantasy, but the overall theme is political intrigue and an analysis of human nature.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
So Dragons, White Walkers and The Lord of Light aren't fantasy to you? These are perfectly reasonable concepts in the real world?

Come on now.
By V4ndall (SI Veteran Member) on Jun 07, 2012
V4ndall
It's fantasy because it's not based on actual history or facts. And given vanilla units, Medieval 2 is actually quite fantasy as well lol.
By danfreeman (SI Core) on Jun 07, 2012
danfreeman
Wait,wait,wait so there ARE mythical creatures in here?Well the way the review was structured all i understood was that they were just myth.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
Clearly you haven't read the book or seen the tv show then xD

Yes it has plenty of living myths, Daenerys has three dragons to start off with.

But just to make the point, even if it didn't have all that it would still be reckoned as High Fantasy.
By The_Tingler (SI Core Member) on Jun 07, 2012
The_Tingler
Basically the thing about Game of Thrones is that the actual fantasy elements like dragons, magic, etc ARE there but are kept very much in the background. And you're right, this makes the series closer to "medieval-style fiction" than anything - and that's part of the appeal. It's kept very realistic and believable, so when the fantasy elements DO appear they have much more of an impact.

As for my point about finding it refreshing, this type of thing in an RPG is rare. We've always got to have dwarves, elves, and dragons in our games and I'm a little sick of it, so I like to find a game world with a bit more restraint.

If you only want dragons in this game, you'll be disappointed. This is set in the time of the books where dragons are extinct. There's a big skull but that's it. No White Walkers either, they're also considered either dead or a myth. There ARE fantasy elements though... but no spoilers.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
Ehm...right...extinct...the show's been out for a while though and the books even longer. Why am I restraining from mentioning light spoilers?
By unsilviu (SI Core) on Jun 07, 2012
unsilviu
Because, although huge, the number of readers and watchers is considerably lower than the number of people who use the internet and might potentially stumble onto your spoilerrific comments :)
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
Well then it's their fault for being culturally lacking!
By nocutius (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
nocutius
Spoilers, a cultural enlightenment :)
By The_Tingler (SI Core Member) on Jun 07, 2012
The_Tingler
Who mentioned spoilers for the books/show? I meant spoilers for the game. Sorry, in that whole last paragraph I was talking just about the game.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
Goodly, because while I hate spoilers, it is a bit unreasonable to wait for more than a year being all careful and such.
By nocutius (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
nocutius
I still haven't seen a single episode of the series :)
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 07, 2012
SirRoderick
I read the books first, good stuff.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on Jun 10, 2012
herodotus
I am half way through the Second Season, and I have to say I have never seen such contrived rubbish in a long time. No originality, dreadful over-acting, a storyline that is so convoluted I don't who is who or who is aligned with who (and don't care) and that white-haired Dragon Princess makes me want to gouge my eyes out.
I'll have to finish it just for the sake of "completism", however it has to go down as the most over-rated, sensationalised, Hollywood-ised unoriginal waste of celluloid I've seen in ages. You can actually see the extras walking around, glancing at the Director and following instruction. talk about no immersion. Makes "Spartacus: Vengeance" look like "Ben Hur".
Anyway, the game. Well, given it's source I'm not surprised at all. Even the RTS version failed.

Might go and watch "Excalibur" just to remind me how a Medieval/Fantasy story should be filmed.
By unsilviu (SI Core) on Jun 10, 2012
unsilviu
I'm not usually one for internet arguments, but... are you talking about the same series I'm watching? I remember thinking I was watching inglorious basterds once, and I was actually watching some italian 70's film called inglorious bastards...

Because the Song of Ice and Fire series is one of the most original and trope-inversing I've seen. This is one of the most wonderfully-realized fictional universes since Tolkien and the most complete after Star Wars.
The game's strong points come when it's closest to the source material from what I've seen. I'm really curious about your arguments.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 10, 2012
SirRoderick
I do feel you're being a bit hard on the show Hero. I mean it's certainly not perfect, but it's hardly the garbage you seem to be summing up. I'd be ranking it as slightly above average.
By unsilviu (SI Core) on Jun 10, 2012
unsilviu
Yeah, it's not quite as good as the books, but still... I wish I could forget book 3 so I'd flip out again at all the things happening.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on Jun 10, 2012
herodotus
I have not found one character remotely original (or likeable), and all are cast with the one directorial comment: "Snarl a lot, and/or look angry and confused".
Sorry guys, I really did try to like the show, and at times it showed promise, but after the ending of Episode 6 Season 2 when poor old Blondie stacks on a turn about her dragons....*anguished sigh*.
It's just too "Hollywood" for me, and too much is trying to be crammed in so if you are not familiar with the books (which the show has turned me off reading) the viewer can easily wonder if they'd fallen asleep and missed something vital.
I AM a harsh critic when it comes to Film & TV and always will be. But I'll try to keep the flames of criticism a bit lower.
At least it's better than "The Iast Airbender", I'll give it that.
By SirRoderick (SI Elite) on Jun 10, 2012
SirRoderick
You actually stopped reading due to the show? That is slightly insane in my opinion, but whatever floats that strange aussie boat.

I will say that the show misses out on a lot of things in the book, which is something I expected since it's a TV show after all. Perhaps this could have been done better, sure.

The characters, as far as I can tell, are pretty much in accordance with the way they were written in the books, but I disagree that they're all a bunch of one-dimensional plaques. Certainly some of the books' nuances are lost in the transcription, but most of it seems to me to come though, perhaps I am biased due to the fact that I already read all the books. The character are already developed further in my mind.

All in all, a good effort but not on a par with the books. Better than most rubbish out there I'd say.
By herodotus (SI Herodotus) on Jun 10, 2012
herodotus
Point taken. I shouldn't be put off reading the books. Perhaps I'm just in an over-critical frame of mind these days, desperately searching for something intangible. Bad week, bad vibes. I'll put it down to that.